Prediction of Verena Meliss [584th] vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters [549th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L W W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Meliss 1 - 0 Peeters
They have played 3 sets in total, with Meliss winning 2 and Peeters winning 1. The last match between Meliss and Peeters was at the W15 Antalya, 16-05-2024, Second, Clay with Verena Meliss getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Verena Meliss | 1 |
| Anouck Vrancken Peeters | 0 |
| Meliss | Stats | Peeters |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (6-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 88% (23-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 584 | Ranking | 549 |
| 487 | Highest Rank | 549 |
| 27 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 3 |
| 48% (220-238) | Career Total W/L | 60% (108-71) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Verena Meliss
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
59 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:49:0 | Average Match Time | 2:49:0 |
| 65% (62/95) | 1st Serve % | 63% (64/101) |
| 52% (32/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (32/64) |
| 36% (12/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (10/37) |
| 45% (10/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (8/12) |
| 58% (59/101) | Return Points Win % | 54% (51/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Verena Meliss vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Meliss 1 - 0 Peeters
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meliss has won 39.83% of points on their second serve, while Peeters has won 37.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meliss, in recent form, has won 49.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peeters has won 48.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.31% and 35.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Meliss has saved 48.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peeters has saved 45.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Meliss has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Peeters winning 69.23% (W/L 36/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Meliss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 161/ 179). Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 81% (W/L 22/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 41/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Meliss has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18), where as Peeters has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 18/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Meliss winning 1 times and Peeters being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Meliss winning 2 and Peeters winning 1. The last match between Meliss and Peeters was at the W15 Antalya, 16-05-2024, Second, Clay with Verena Meliss getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Meliss and Peeters have played a deciding set 1 times, with Meliss winning 1 times and Peeters 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Meliss winning 0, and Peeters 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meliss has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.82 while Peeters has played against players with an average rank of 168.54.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meliss has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peeters has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Meliss has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peeters has converted 41.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Verena Meliss vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Best Odds For The Match
Verena Meliss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Min Liu
61%
(
81 of
133)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
0
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
0
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
59 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Verena Meliss
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Verena Meliss
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Verena Meliss
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Ezgi Cagil Ozcelik
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Verena Meliss
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
16
Total Points Won
9
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Barbara Dessolis
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
45%
(
9 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
61%
(
22 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
39
Total Points Won
40
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Verena Meliss
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Esther Lopez Alcaraz
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
12
Total Points Won
5
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Siskova
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Julita Saner
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Victoria Allen
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Ann Akasha Ceuca
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Jeong Moon
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Katarina Kuzmova
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Meliss vs Peeters?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Meliss Vs Peeters is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (220/238) | Win/Loss | 60% (108/71) |
| 49% (515/532) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (240/172) |
| 50% (4821/4780) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2030/1705) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 705 | Aces Total | 107 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1619 | Total Double Faults | 807 |
| 1:21:33 | Average Match Time | 1:34:13 |
| 203.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 161.16 |
| 63% (15358/24268) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6487/10341) |
| 61% (9361/15358) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3807/6487) |
| 43% (3816/8910) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1671/3854) |
| 47% (1363/2898) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (734/1390) |
| 45% (10773/23843) | Return Points Win % | 49% (4937/10017) |
| 48% (214/444) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (107/177) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (55/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (11/26) |
| 44% (58/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (31/56) |
| 81% (226/183) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (96/85) |
| 19% (226/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (96/11) |
| 16% (232/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (83/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
